Comparative Filtration of Laundry Wastewater using River Sand & It’s Quality Enhancement through Multimedia Filtration
Date
2024-06-30
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering(CEE), Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh
Abstract
Water is an essential component of our natural environment, often referred to as life.
However, human activities have significantly contributed to the contamination of this
precious resource. A worthy illustration of water pollution is the wastewater generated
from laundry activities. This study aims to assess the quality of laundry wastewater by
evaluating various quality parameters and to determine which one sand among two,
sourced from the beds of the Turag and Padma Rivers, is more effective for filtration
purposes. The reason behind utilizing riverbed sand lies in its composition, which
includes silica, mica, and feldspar, all known for their efficacy in wastewater filtration.
The study involved installing the more effective riverbed sand into a multimedia filter
as a layer to observe enhancements in the removal rates of contaminants. Two separate
single-layer sand filters, each using sand from the Turag and Padma riverbeds,
demonstrated significant removal capabilities for total solids, total dissolved solids, and
total suspended solids. After proper analysis, the results indicated that the filtration
process produced quality effluents that met the Environmental Conservation Rules
(ECR) 2023 guidelines for industrial effluent discharge into inland water bodies. When
subjected to proper filtration through the multimedia filter, which included one layer of
better river sand among Turag and Padma in terms of filtration capacity, commercial
granular activated carbon, and coarse sand, the average removal rates for colour,
turbidity, total solids, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids and chemical oxygen
demand were about 95%, 98%, 84%, 84%, 80% and 68% respectively which can be
considered as a remarkable example. Additionally, the average dissolved oxygen (DO)
increase was 284.3%. These findings underscore the potential of riverbed sand,
particularly when integrated into a multimedia filtration system, to significantly
enhance the removal of pollutants from laundry wastewater. This study not only
provides a viable solution for mitigating water pollution but also contributes to the
sustainability of the environment.
Description
Supervised by
Dr. Amimul Ahsan,
Associate Professor,
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering(CEE),
Islamic University of Technology(IUT),
Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh.
This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2024
Keywords
Citation
Ciabattia, I., Cesaro, F., Faralli, L., Fatarella, E., & Tognotti, F. (2009). Demonstration of a treatment system for purification and reuse of laundry wastewater. Desalination, 245(1-3), 451-459. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011916409003580 Doménech-Sánchez, A., Laso, E., & Berrocal, C. I. (2021). Water loss in swimming pool filter backwashing processes in the Balearic Islands (Spain). Water Policy, 23(5), 1314-1328. https://iwaponline.com/wp/article/23/5/1314/84063/Water-loss-in swimming-pool-filter-backwashing Martikainen, K. (2023). Wastewater treatment in rural areas: Functionality of sand filters and suitability of filter media for reuse (Doctoral dissertation, Itä-Suomen yliopisto). https://dspace.uef.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/29399/urn_isbn_978-952- 61-4831-1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Petrovic, M., Radjenovic, J., & Barcelo, D. (2011). Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are applied for wastewater and drinking water treatment. Elimination of pharmaceuticals. The holistic approach to Environment, 1(2), 63-74. https://hrcak.srce.hr/clanak/103247 Petrusevski, B., Sharma, S. K., Kruis, F., Omeruglu, P., & Schippers, J. C. (2002). Family filter with iron-coated sand: solution for arsenic removal in rural areas. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 2(5-6), 127-133. https://iwaponline.com/ws/article-abstract/2/5-6/127/25675 Pooi, C. K., & Ng, H. Y. (2018). Review of low-cost point-of-use water treatment systems for developing communities. npj Clean Water, 1(1), 11. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41545-018-0011-0 Singh, S., Ahammed, M. M., & Shaikh, I. N. (2021, March). Combined coagulation and intermittent sand filtration for on-site treatment of greywater. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1114, No. 1, p. 012031). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/1114/1/012031/meta Stevik, T. K., Aa, K., Ausland, G., & Hanssen, J. F. (2004). Retention and removal of pathogenic bacteria in wastewater percolating through porous media: a review. Water Research, 38(6), 1355-1367. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135403007140 Verma, S., Daverey, A., & Sharma, A. (2017). Slow sand filtration for water and wastewater treatment–a review. Environmental Technology Reviews, 6(1), 47-58. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21622515.2016.1278278
