Image forgery detection comparison between MobileNetV2 and VGG16 convolutional neural networks

dc.contributor.advisorUddin, Jia
dc.contributor.authorNandy, Aritra
dc.contributor.authorHasan, Md. Mustakim
dc.contributor.authorSayad, Abu Bakar Md
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Imteenan Akhter
dc.contributor.authorAnindita, Amina Azad
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-29T09:08:52Z
dc.date.available2025-09-29T09:08:52Z
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 31-34).
dc.descriptionThis thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, 2020.
dc.description.abstractAs there are an immense scope of useful assets to alter images now, the requirement for confirming the authenticity of images is more necessary than any time in recent memory. While forgery techniques are progressively getting better that even human perception appears quite difficult to perceive these changes, regular algorithms, which attempt to identify altering patterns, frequently pre-define suppositions that restrict the extent of issue. In this manner, such strategies fail to detect forgery strategies in computer programs. Inside the following publication, we initiate structure which uses Machine Learning methods to distinguish forged photos. Consequently, the MobileNetV2 network in [40] is altered with the goal that it very well may be well equipped to the goal of image forgery identification. It is contended by the rest spatial measurements of initial layers, the system is probably going to learn prominent highlights in these layers, and afterward succeeding layers are to extract these prominent highlights and coming to a conclusion determining an image is tampered. Furthermore, by our e orts we additionally lead an extensive examination to demonstrate those contentions. Exploratory outcomes show that this architecture-modified system accomplishes an amazing accuracy of 93.15%, which outperforms VGG16 neural network on which the previously defined system depends with a margin of healthy amount up to 10.05%.
dc.identifier.otherID 16101315
dc.identifier.otherID 16110018
dc.identifier.otherID 15301115
dc.identifier.otherID 15301008
dc.identifier.otherID 13310004
dc.identifier.otherhttps://dspace.bracu.ac.bd/server/api/core/items/0aa5e1a6-f53b-474d-9c62-07bbc909d0c5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/26806
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBRAC University
dc.sourceBRAC University Institutional Repository
dc.subjectMobileNetV2
dc.subjectVGG16
dc.subjectCopy-move forgery
dc.subjectSplicing forgery
dc.subjectPicture tampering
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subjectCNN
dc.subjectNeural networks
dc.subjectImage forgery detection
dc.titleImage forgery detection comparison between MobileNetV2 and VGG16 convolutional neural networks
dc.typeThesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
16101315, 16110018, 15301115, 15301008, 13310004_CSE.pdf
Size:
1.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format