Image forgery detection comparison between MobileNetV2 and VGG16 convolutional neural networks

Abstract

As there are an immense scope of useful assets to alter images now, the requirement for confirming the authenticity of images is more necessary than any time in recent memory. While forgery techniques are progressively getting better that even human perception appears quite difficult to perceive these changes, regular algorithms, which attempt to identify altering patterns, frequently pre-define suppositions that restrict the extent of issue. In this manner, such strategies fail to detect forgery strategies in computer programs. Inside the following publication, we initiate structure which uses Machine Learning methods to distinguish forged photos. Consequently, the MobileNetV2 network in [40] is altered with the goal that it very well may be well equipped to the goal of image forgery identification. It is contended by the rest spatial measurements of initial layers, the system is probably going to learn prominent highlights in these layers, and afterward succeeding layers are to extract these prominent highlights and coming to a conclusion determining an image is tampered. Furthermore, by our e orts we additionally lead an extensive examination to demonstrate those contentions. Exploratory outcomes show that this architecture-modified system accomplishes an amazing accuracy of 93.15%, which outperforms VGG16 neural network on which the previously defined system depends with a margin of healthy amount up to 10.05%.

Description

Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 31-34).
This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, 2020.

Keywords

MobileNetV2, VGG16, Copy-move forgery, Splicing forgery, Picture tampering, Machine learning, CNN, Neural networks, Image forgery detection

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By