PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF R32/R600a BLEND WITH TiO2/MO NANOFLUID FOR EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM
| dc.contributor.author | Ahmed, M. I. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ahamed, J. U. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Razzaq, M. E. A. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-06T20:58:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-06T20:58:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | Oct-2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This experimental study investigated the energy and exergy performance of R32/R600a (50:50 by mass) | |
| dc.description.abstract | with TiO2 nanofluid for a residential air conditioning system which was originally designed for R22. | |
| dc.description.abstract | R32/R600a has been used along with 0.01%-0.02% volume concentration TiO2 | |
| dc.description.abstract | nanolubricant. Cetyl | |
| dc.description.abstract | trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) has been used as surfactant. Pressures and temperatures of | |
| dc.description.abstract | different components have been recorded for measuring energy and exergy parameters. RERPROP 7 | |
| dc.description.abstract | software has been used to determine the thermal properties of the refrigerants and the blend at different | |
| dc.description.abstract | conditions. The results show that the R32/R600a has lower value of COP compared to R22. Numerically | |
| dc.description.abstract | R32/R600a blend has 32%, blend with 0.01% nanofluid has 26% and blend with 0.02% nanofluid has | |
| dc.description.abstract | 61% less COP than R22. However, refrigerating effect of the blend has increased by 10 percent compared | |
| dc.description.abstract | to R22 while the blend with 0.01% and 0.02% has 20% and 9% more refrigerating effect respectively. | |
| dc.description.abstract | Again, the blend without nanofluid and along with nanofluid (0.01%, 0.02%) have 25%, 7% and 3% | |
| dc.description.abstract | more power consumption than that of R22 respectively. Exergy analysis shows R32/R600a blend and the | |
| dc.description.abstract | 0.01%, 0.02% nanofluid have higher irreversibility compared to R22. Overall, R32/R600a blend is not | |
| dc.description.abstract | suitable for retrofitting in R22 system. | |
| dc.identifier.other | http://103.99.128.19:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/358 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://103.99.128.19:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/358 | |
| dc.publisher | Department of Mechanical Engineering | |
| dc.source | CUET Digital Repository | |
| dc.subject | Nanofluid, | |
| dc.subject | Exergy, | |
| dc.subject | Alternate Refrigerant, | |
| dc.subject | COP, | |
| dc.subject | Irreversibility, | |
| dc.subject | Stability | |
| dc.title | PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF R32/R600a BLEND WITH TiO2/MO NANOFLUID FOR EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
