Neighborhood Environment and Quality of Life of Older Adults in Eastern Nepal: Findings from a Cross-sectional Study

dc.contributor.authorSapkota, Krishna Prasad
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, Aman
dc.contributor.authorGhimire, Saruna
dc.contributor.authorMistry, Sabuj Kanti
dc.contributor.authorYadav, Krishna Kumar
dc.contributor.authorYadav, Shubash Chandra
dc.contributor.authorMehta, Ranju Kumari
dc.contributor.authorQuasim, Rubina
dc.contributor.authorTamang, Man Kumar
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Devendra Raj
dc.contributor.authorYadav, Om Prakash
dc.contributor.authorMehata, Suresh
dc.contributor.authorYadav, Uday Narayan
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-01T04:49:44Z
dc.date.available2025-06-01T04:49:44Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-13
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Quality of life (QoL) is a subjective measure reflecting individuals’ evaluations based on their personal goals and values. While global research shows the role of neighborhood factors like ethnic diversity and socio-cultural dynamics on QoL, these are unexplored in the Nepali context. Therefore, this study examined the relationship between neighborhood environment and QoL among Nepali older adults in eastern Nepal. Methods This cross-sectional study involved 847 non-institutionalized older adults (aged ≥ 60 years) from two districts in eastern Nepal. QoL was evaluated using the 13-item brief Older People’s Quality of Life questionnaire, where a mean score of < 3 indicated low/poor QoL. The neighborhood environment, conceptualized across three domains (demographic, socio-cultural, and built environment), included ethnic diversity, connections with family, friends, and neighbors, cultural ties, residential stability, and rurality. Their association with QoL was examined using multivariable logistic regression. Results Around 20% of older adults reported poor QoL. Higher ethnic diversity (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04–0.36), moderate contact with family and relatives (aOR = 0.26, CI: 0.11–0.61), and high contact with neighbors (aOR = 0.09, CI: 0.03–0.21) were associated with lower odds of poor QoL. Conversely, high contact with friends (aOR = 2.29, CI: 1.30–4.04) and unstable residence (OR = 6.25, CI: 2.03–19.23) increased the odds of poor QoL. Additionally, among the covariates, chronic disease, tobacco use, unemployment, and lack of education were also significantly associated with poor QoL. Conclusion Overall, the demographic environment, socio-cultural factors, and the built environment of the neighborhood influence QoL. Therefore, diversifying the neighborhood’s ethnic composition, promoting social connections such as frequent contact with family, relatives, and neighbors, and ensuring residential stability can enhance the QoL of older adults.
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dspace.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd:8080/handle/123456789/13781
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd:8080/handle/123456789/13781
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.sourceDIU Institutional Repository
dc.subjectNeighborhood
dc.subjectEnvironment
dc.titleNeighborhood Environment and Quality of Life of Older Adults in Eastern Nepal: Findings from a Cross-sectional Study
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s12877-024-05278-6.pdf
Size:
1.57 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections