A good mix against ultra-poverty? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) in Bangladesh

dc.contributor.authorRahman, Atiya
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharjee, Anindita
dc.contributor.authorDas, Narayan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-19T06:19:59Z
dc.date.available2024-08-19T06:19:59Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-13
dc.descriptionThis article was published in The Review of Development Economics [©2021 Rights managed by Wiley] and the definite version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12809 The Article's website is at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rode.12809
dc.description.abstractExisting evidence shows that programs that provide grants to productive assets along with training to very poor women increase labor supply, earnings, and consumption. In contrast, evidence on the effect of microcredit on these outcomes is mixed. In this paper, we examine the effect of a hybrid of the two approaches—credit and grant—on the livelihoods of the ultra-poor in Bangladesh. A randomized evaluation of the hybrid intervention shows that it increases labor supply of working-age women, household income, productive assets, savings, and consumption expenditures. The benefit–cost ratio of the intervention is estimated to be 8.47.
dc.identifier.otherhttps://dspace.bracu.ac.bd/server/api/core/items/34780b08-32be-43b3-ab00-2c93210c8b4d
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/23796
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.sourceBRAC University Institutional Repository
dc.subjectUltra-poor
dc.subjectSkills training
dc.subjectMicrocredit
dc.subjectCredit and grants
dc.titleA good mix against ultra-poverty? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) in Bangladesh
dc.typeArticle

Files