Evaluating community ORT programmes: indicators for use and safety

dc.contributor.authorChowdhury, AMR
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-18T05:53:05Z
dc.date.available2019-12-18T05:53:05Z
dc.date.issued1986
dc.description.abstractCommunity-based oral rehydration programmes to reduce diarrhoea-related mortality have been initiated in many developing countries in recent years. However, to date few evaluation studies have been carried out on these programmes and there is poor standardization in the indicators used. This paper discusses mainly the problems surrounding the intermediate process indicators: availability of ingredients; people's perceptions about diarrhoea and its treatment; and knowledge, safety and usage of oral rehydration solutions (ORS), with usage being discussed in some detail. Impact indicators based on mortality are discussed more briefly. Although most evaluations have studied the mortality impact of these programmes, it is suggested that programme evaluations should initially concentrate on process indicators to demonstrate how well the programme has been implemented. Only when implementation is successful and usage of ORS per diarrhoea episode is high can there be an appreciable impact on mortality.
dc.identifier.citationChowdhury, A. (1986). Evaluating community ORT programmes: indicators for use and safety. Health Policy and Planning, 1(3), 214–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/1.3.214
dc.identifier.otherhttps://dspace.bracu.ac.bd/server/api/core/items/7736da90-2de6-44ee-b91b-865a46edd41b
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10361/13297
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisher© 1986 Oxford University Press
dc.sourceBRAC University Institutional Repository
dc.subjectDiarrhea
dc.subjectDeveloping countries
dc.subjectProgram
dc.subjectOral rehydration solutions
dc.subjectCommunity
dc.titleEvaluating community ORT programmes: indicators for use and safety
dc.typeArticle

Files