Orthographic Gaussian Splatting from Axially Stacked Radiographs via SfM-Guided Novel ViewSynthesis

Thumbnail Image

Date

2025-10-25

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Department of Computer Science and Engineering(CSE), Islamic University of Technology(IUT), Board Bazar, Gazipur-1704, Bangladesh

Abstract

We present a Gaussian-splatting pipeline tailored to axially stacked radiographs that breaks with the perspective and alpha-blending assumptions of standard 3DGS. Clini cal CT data are orthographic and exhibit little cross-slice feature continuity, causing classical SfM and vanilla splat renderers to fail (edge-biased splats, central collapse). Our method first converts ordered CT slices into a metric volume, then renders **ra diographic** projections that obey Beer–Lambert attenuation to synthesize multi-view images with controlled overlap. From these, we obtain poses and train a **rectified radiative Gaussian** model that replaces alpha compositing with additive X-ray ac cumulation and includes a density-rectification term so each Gaussian’s parameter encodes true 3D density rather than view-integrated mass. We initialize Gaussians directly from the slice volume with a lightweight sampler that seeds positions, scales, and densities, and stabilize optimization with gentle TV-on-voxel readouts and adap tive clone/split densification. On a 1.8k-slice brain CT (HiP-CT family), using 1.2k synthetic projections, our system reconstructs coherent anatomy and produces faithful novel projections after 45 minutes of training, visibly restoring central structures and suppressing edge-only artifacts compared to a cinematic-GS baseline. The approach is code-practical (no reliance on FDK/TIGRE), data-efficient, and compatible with DICOM geometry, offering a reproducible path to fast, radiography-consistent 3D reconstructions from orthographic medical stacks. We discuss remaining limits (pose accuracy, scatter, regularization strength) and outline ablations and metrics (L1/SSIM on held-out views, orthogonal-slice fidelity) to guide future clinical validation.

Description

Supervised by Mr. Tareque MohmudChowdhury, Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) Islamic University of Technology (IUT) Board Bazar, Gazipur, Bangladesh This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Software Engineering, 2025

Keywords

Citation

• Liu,Y., Li, C., Yang, C., Yuan, Y.(2024). EndoGaussian: Real-timeGaussianSplat ting for DynamicEndoscopicSceneReconstruction. arXivpreprintarXiv:2401.12561. • Kerbl, B., Kopanas, G., Leimkühler, T., Drettakis, G. (2023). 3D Gaussian Splat ting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 42(4). https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04079 • Cai, Y., Liang, Y., Wang, J., Wang, A., Zhang, Y., Yang, X., Zhou, Z., Yuille, A. L. (2024). X-Gaussian: Radiative Gaussian Splatting for Efficient X-Ray Novel View Synthesis. In ECCV 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04116 • Zha,R.,Lin, T.J., Cai, Y., Cao, J., Zhang, Y., Li, H. (2024). R2-Gaussian: Rectifying Radiative Gaussian Splatting for Tomographic Reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20693 (Accepted at NeurIPS 2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2405.20693 • Nikolakakis, E., Gupta, U., Bui, J., Vengosh, J., Marinescu, R. V. (2025). GaSpCT: Gaussian Splatting for Novel Brain CBCT Projection View Synthesis. Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 2025: Image Processing, 13406:1340619. https://doi. org/10.1117/12.3045479 • Nikolakakis, E., Gupta, U., Vengosh, J., Bui, J., Marinescu, R. (2024). GaSpCT: GaussianSplattingforNovelCTProjectionViewSynthesis. arXivpreprintarXiv:2404.03126. • Niedermayr, S., Neuhauser, C., Petkov, K., Engel, K., Westermann, R. (2024). Application of 3D Gaussian Splatting for Cinematic Anatomy on Consumer Class Devices. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.11285. • Kleinbeck, C., Schieber, H., Engel, K., Gutjahr, R., Roth, D. (2024). Multi 58 Layer Gaussian Splatting for Immersive Anatomy Visualization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.16978. • Yu,Z.,Chen,A.,Huang,B.,Sattler, T., Geiger, A.(2024). Mip-Splatting: Alias-free 3D Gaussian Splatting. In CVPR 2024. • Wu,G., Yi, T., Fang, J., Xie, L., Zhang, X., Wei, W., Liu, W., Tian, Q., Wang, X. (2024). 4D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Dynamic Scene Rendering. In CVPR 2024, pp. 20310–20320. • Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P. P., Tancik, M., Barron, J. T., Ramamoorthi, R., Ng, R. (2020). NeRF: Representing Scenes as Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis. In ECCV2020. • Barron, J. T., Mildenhall, B., Verbin, D., Srinivasan, P. P., Hedman, P. (2022). Mip-NeRF 360: Unbounded Anti-Aliased Neural Radiance Fields. In CVPR 2022. • Schönberger, J. L., Frahm, J.-M. (2016). Structure-from-Motion Revisited. In CVPR2016. • Zwicker, M., Pfister, H., van Baar, J., Gross, M. (2001). Surface Splatting. SIG GRAPH2001,pp. 371–378. • Kajiya, J. T. (1986). The Rendering Equation. SIGGRAPH 1986. • Oshina, I., Spigulis, J. (2021). Beer–Lambert law for optical tissue diagnostics: current state of the art and the main limitations. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 26(10):100901. • Feldkamp, L. A., Davis, L. C., Kress, J. W. (1984). Practical Cone-Beam Algorithm. JOSA A,1(6):612–619. • Kak, A.C., Slaney, M. (2001). Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging. SIAM. • Walsh, C. L., Tafforeau, P., et al. (2021). Imaging intact human organs using HiP-CT. Nature Methods, 18, 1532–1541. • DICOMPS3.3—InformationObject Definitions. NEMA (current). • Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., Simoncelli, E. P. (2004). Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4):600–612. • Zhang, R., Isola, P., Efros, A. A., Shechtman, E., Wang, O. (2018). The Unreason able Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric. In CVPR 2018. 59 • Knapitsch, A., Park, J., Zhou, Q.-Y., Koltun, V. (2017). Tanks and Temples: Bench marking Large-Scale Scene Reconstruction. ACM TOG, 36(4). • Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P. P., Ortiz-Cayon, R., Khademi Kalantari, N., Ra mamoorthi, R., Ng, R., Kar, A. (2019). Local Light Field Fusion: Practical View Synthesis with Prescriptive Sampling Guidelines. In CVPR 2019

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By