Machine learning & deep learning approaches for respiratory sound-based disease detection
| dc.contributor.author | Imrog, Md. Toufiq | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rahman, G. M Musfiqur | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-24T03:16:42Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-24T03:16:42Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-07-24 | |
| dc.description | Project Report | |
| dc.description.abstract | Throughout the past decennium, there occurred a lot of scrutiny in the field of spontaneous respiratory sound inspection. The efficacy about decision-making could be improved by the automated systematization about respiratory sounds that could identify anomalies beforehand stages about respiratory dysfunction. It would be advantageous to develop an automatic machine & deep learning-based respiratory sound classification system. The predominant role about the first scientific challenge were to develop algorithms which could distinguish pulmonary audio clips taken originating at both non-medical & medical domains. About 920 recordings in the database were obtained from 126 subjects & were produced by 2 empiricists groups in Portugal & Greece. Recorded were 6898 respiration cycles. Respiratory specialists annotated the cycles as involving Wheezes, Crackles & aggregating both, or absence of abnormal breathing sounds. To facilitate effectiveness of our models, the dataset split up into 3 subcategories: A split of 70% data for training, 15% data for testing, and 15% data for model validation. The importance of having a robust and generalizable model, various data pre-processing techniques were applied. These techniques included Adam Optimizer, Sequential Minimal Optimization and Gradient Descent. We implemented and evaluated several machine learning & deep learning architectures, encompassing Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Random Forest (RF) & Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) which are widely used in various fields. Among those, CNN emerged as the most effective model, achieving 99.5% accuracy during training & 98.5% accuracy during testing along with a validation accuracy of 98.5%, thus outperforming the other models. ANN & SVM also demonstrated high performance, with accuracies around 96.6% & 91.5%, while KNN & RF achieved an accuracy of 88.3% & 88.1% respectively. In a clinical setting, the suggested method is very important since it can help doctors with automated illness identification & diagnosis. | |
| dc.identifier.other | http://dspace.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd:8080/handle/123456789/14703 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd:8080/handle/123456789/14703 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Daffodil International University | |
| dc.source | DIU Institutional Repository | |
| dc.subject | Vector Machine | |
| dc.subject | Machine Learning | |
| dc.subject | Deep Learning | |
| dc.title | Machine learning & deep learning approaches for respiratory sound-based disease detection | |
| dc.type | Other |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- 27526.pdf.txt
- Size:
- 117.74 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
