Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Hossain, Mohammad Awlad"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    MANOSHI Working Paper Series No 2
    (icddr,b, 2009-06) Hossain, Mohammad Awlad; Mridha, Malay Kanti; Alam, Badrul; Nahar, Shahinur; Wahed, Tasnuva
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pilot project on capacity development of the unqualified/semi qualified Allopathic healthcare providers
    (BRAC Research and Evaluation Division (RED), 2006-12) Hossain, Mohammad Awlad; Ahmed, Syed Masud
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Rapid assessment survey of current sanitation immunization and contraception status in selected unions
    (BRAC Research and Evaluation Division (RED), 2006-11) Hossain, Mohammad Awlad; Ali, Ahmed; Nazimuddin; Joarder, Aroj Ali; Ahmed, Farid
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Taking doctors where the ultra poor are: Assessment of the panel doctor
    (BRAC Research and Evaluation Division and Aga Khan Foundation Canada, 2007-05) Ahmed, Syed Masud; Hossain, Mohammad Awlad
    To facilitate access of ultra-poor households to qualified allopathic care, especially for moderate-to-severe and chronic morbidities, the Challenging the Frontiers of Poverty Reduction/Targeting the Ultra Poor (CFPR/TUP) program appointed a panel of doctors in its Area Offices. This study was carried out to assess the current status of this ‘panel doctor’ scheme, identify its problems and prospects from a participatory perspective, and suggest remedial measures for future improvement. Two Upazilas from each of the 12 CFPR/TUP regions where the scheme is running for more than one year were included in the survey. Research activities included an inventory of physical facilities, participant observation of the services provided, and exit interviews of the patients coming for treatment in these 24 sites. In addition, in-depth interviews with 12 panel doctors and six focus group discussions with groups of health workers and the community people were done. Findings reveal that the scheme was received favourably by the ultra-poor and the beneficiaries were satisfied with the services of the panel doctors. However, some concerns were raised with respect to the responsiveness of the scheme as also financial restrictions imposed such as capping the costs of medicines and lab tests. These issues need some rethinking in order to improve the ability of the scheme to mitigate the income-erosion consequences of ill-health for ultra-poor households and contribute to their efforts at sustainable livelihood.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Taking doctors where the ultra poor are: assessment of the panel doctor scheme of CFPR/TUP programme
    (BRAC Research and Evaluation Division (RED), 2007-05) Ahmed, Syed Masud; Hossain, Mohammad Awlad
    To facilitate access of ultra poor households to qualified allopathic care, especially for moderate-tosevere and chronic morbidities, the Challenging the Frontiers of Poverty Reduction/Targeting the Ultra Poor (CFPR/TUP) programme appointed a panel of doctors in its Area Offices. This study was carried out to assess the current status of this ‘panel doctor’ scheme, identify its problems and prospects from a participatory perspective, and suggest remedial measures for future improvement. Two upazilas from each of the 12 CFPR/TUP regions where the scheme is running for more than one year were included in the survey. Research activities included inventory of physical facilities, participant observation of the services provided, and exit interviews of the patients coming for treatment in these 24 sites. In addition, in-depth interviews with 12 panel doctors and six focus group discussions with groups of health workers and the community people were done. Findings reveal that the scheme was received favourably by the ultra poor and the beneficiaries were satisfied with the services of the panel doctors. However, some concerns were raised with respect to responsiveness of the scheme as also financial restrictions imposed such as capping the costs of medicines and lab tests. These issues need some rethinking in order to improve the ability of the scheme to mitigate the income-erosion consequences of ill-health for the ultra poor households and contribute to their efforts at sustainable livelihood.

© Open Research Bangladesh

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback